"Back to Basics" manifesto
At Bungay convention this year I was chatting to Ewan about the 'ethos' of a festival.
About 5 years ago I wrote a 'manifesto' summing up the type of event that I would like to organise and/or attend. I called it "Back to Basics" because it seemed to me that festivals have got more and more complex in recent years, making them harder to run, and therefore dissuading people from volunteering to run them.
I realised I never published my manifesto, so I reproduce it here in case it resonates with anyone and inspires them to use or modify it for future events :-)
Richard
Back To Basics manifesto
----------------------------------
This is a proposal for a simpler type of juggling convention which should be easier for the organiser to run, and which involves the convention-goer more in the ownership of the event.
A "Back to Basics" convention should supply these 5 items:
Rest: somewhere to sleep; e.g. camping, rooms, crash space in hall, etc
Hygiene: somewhere to wash, use the toilet, dispose of rubbish
Sustenance: somewhere to buy food and get drinking water; could be a café or just directions to local shops
Space: somewhere to juggle and somewhere to chill; could be a hall, a tent, or just open space if the weather is reliable
Communication: some means for people to self-organise what they want to happen; e.g. a blackboard
That's it.
A "Back to Basics" convention should not organise: a show, games, workshops, parade, renegade, parties, or anything else. The convention should be organic, with any events organised by the attendees as they want them to happen, not by the convention organisers.
Back to Basics conventions may vary in quality, and the idea is experimental, but that's part of the fun :-)
One of the advantages is that it should be possible for one or two people to run such a convention rather than needing a whole team.
As an aside, the UK World Juggling Day events fit into the pattern of a BTB convention.
pumpkineater23 - - Parent #
Brilliant idea. That is exactly the kind of festival I would like to go to.
Experimental? Sounds exactly like the Keventions (held in 2008 & 2009) & Llamafest. I can confirm that the format works exceptionally well. More of this sort of thing!
Jugglers will always find a way to entertain themselves, so spending big on entertainment is nice but not necessary.
I wonder how many would turn up to a BJC organised to this format.
Little Paul - - Parent #
I suspect there would be a number of people turning up to a BJC who would be very disappointed if it were run like this, because many peoples expectations of a BJC are somewhat high. (to the point that they expect everything to be laid on for them and whine mightily if you ask them to volunteer for anything) - doesn't mean they're right, or that this approach is wrong, just that perhaps it's not an approach which would suit a BJC.
However, festivals I have been to which are pretty much run along these lines (not just juggling ones) work great!
At the moment I think the sort of person who would be disappointed would not bother going.
I think you are right that people's expectations are very high part of me thinks this is a problem (& I suspect this problem is part of Richard's motivation for this manifesto). I don't believe that that expectation needs to be diminished but more people need to understand that they are responsible for how good a festival is.
I think more B2B festivals would help because more people would experience spontaneous entertainment popping up. It's a bit like the experiments where removing all road signs & markings from junctions can make them safer because it forces people to think for themselves & pay more attention.
Little Paul - - Parent #
If you were to try this approach with a BJC, you've have to make it abundantly clear up front and in all advertising that it's a BJC unlike any other and that nothing was on offer up front - so that those with standard BJC expectations don't turn up.
I agree that the "I'm a consumer" attitude so prevalent at BJCs (and many other festivals) is a problem, and that this approach is a healthy way to run a festival - and perhaps as part of a long term goal and a concerted mission to migrate the festival scene towards this... perhaps it could work at a BJC.
Just perhaps not yet!
Richard Loxley - - Parent #
Indeed, the "feature creep" at BJCs over the years has been a bit of a turn-off for me.
When I was new to the scene I had a goal of running a 1-day convention, then running some weekend conventions, and finally graduate to running a BJC.
Well I've done the 1-day conventions (several years of BoB), kind-of-done the weekend convention (I've run weekend events for 40-50 people for my birthday over the last few years). But the grand scheme has been shelved as running a BJC no longer holds any interest for me - there is too much loaded expectation for me to enjoy running one.
Then I saw smaller festivals going the way and that saddened me. So that's when I wrote the manifesto.
I just checked the modification date on the file, and I originally wrote it 6 years ago on 14 April 2007. Which was the Saturday of the second Nottingham BJC! That's no reflection on the quality of that convention, but more despair about the expectations put on future convention organisers from such a great convention!
Different people like different styles of conventions, it is good we have a choice of so many conventions in the UK that we can go to the one which style suits us best; a turn up & camp like WJD, laid back like Bungay, or one with lots of things to do like BJC (in fact there was a proposal for a do nothing day at Pickering BJC where people could just socialise (or juggle) without anything scheduled, but it turned out there wasn't space for it in the programme).
What works well for a small convention of 100-200 jugglers will not necessarily "just" scale up for a larger event, I find as the number of people gets larger it can be more detached and individual attendees feel less responsible for the event. The attitude and atmosphere can be quite different.
Some things that can work for a 2-3 day convention won't work for a one-day convention (or 12 hour convention) as there might not be time for people to think of an idea and create it in that time frame. It also depends on the people coming to an event, those who have organised conventions before will know what needs doing and know how to help, newcomers might not be so knowledgeable.
Communication is very often a problem at many conventions - word of mouth is very easy in principle, but then chinese whispers is an amusing game (though some people forget they are in the game). It seems to be more than lack of enthusiasm to make signs, there seem to be some hippy-minded people who regard helpful signage or public display of useful information as an authoritarian imposition on their freedom to go the wrong direction or not know something. If you want people to volunteer - let them know (in a friendly way), don't just expect them to know because that's what usually happens (especially if they haven't been before).
Conventions are still being organised, so it would appear that people are still willing to organise them (this year there are at least 2 new conventions on the UK calendar and the return of 2 or more lapsed conventions). Hopefully organisers realise it is their event so they can organise it their way and not feel obligated to conform to some standard formula of juggling convention (though if they are going to drastically change an established event it would only be fair to advertise this to people coming to it).
Conventions are still being organised
Indeed of the top 5 convention hosting countries since 2000 (Netherlands, France, Germany, UK, USA) there are no obvious downward trends & only one country is down this year on the year before.
Year | NL | FR | DE | UK | US |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 2 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 33 |
2001 | 2 | 7 | 17 | 22 | 37 |
2002 | 4 | 10 | 22 | 29 | 43 |
2003 | 8 | 12 | 14 | 30 | 45 |
2004 | 6 | 4 | 23 | 23 | 41 |
2005 | 10 | 4 | 16 | 30 | 47 |
2006 | 6 | 9 | 23 | 27 | 53 |
2007 | 4 | 9 | 32 | 19 | 44 |
2008 | 7 | 7 | 25 | 29 | 42 |
2009 | 5 | 9 | 37 | 25 | 46 |
2010 | 4 | 7 | 22 | 29 | 44 |
2011 | 4 | 9 | 28 | 27 | 36 |
2012 | 8 | 8 | 25 | 28 | 41 |
2013 | 10 | 15 | 46 | 34 | 37 |
It might be a little early to be interpreting 2013 data, we are not even half way through the year yet. There might quite possibly be some more (unannounced so far) conventions in the USA in the next seven months.
I've never been to a juggling festival but I wouldn't want to attend anything more complicated than this! Perfect idea.
I watched this charming video giving a lesson on leadership today. I think this is vaguely related to this subject, specifically the part about attendees self organising entertainment.
https://youtu.be/fW8amMCVAJQ
If you want something to happen at a festival - just do it.
If you see something happening that looks fun, don't just watch - get up & join in!
Richard Loxley - - Parent #
Very nice!
If you watch a longer version of that video (I don't recommend it) I think it is more an example of critical mass for herd instinct rather than example of leadership.
www.youtube.com/v/nU7dxkIz1Vs
A reasonable proportion of the things at BJC already conform to this pattern - people who are not part of that year's team particularly, but who have something that they bring and organise at BJC because that's where the infrastructure is and that's where the jugglers are.
Off the top of my head - BYJOTY, kendama compos, BBMC, Matt B-M's open stage, many renegades, the Old Skool and of course a lot of the workshops. Arguably, all the Circus Space / Circomedia shows are like this too.
At the BJCs I've been involved in, most or all of the extra frill stuff has been done outside the core team, and the core team have been mainly running themselves ragged organising the camping, security, toilets, food, and so forth.
I guess the distinction between "convention organisers" and "attendees" is rather faint. At BJC2012 I wanted to have a go at scheduling workshops, so I put in a lot of effort to make what you might call a seriously overscheduled set of workshops. Was I a convention organiser there? Or was I an attendee getting involved and making something happen that I wanted to see? Ultimately from the amount of running around I did (and the fact that the schedule was on the website) I don't think you could tell the difference.
I wondered at first what you're imagining that's different from Bungay or Bristol... are you thinking of something like an "Unconference"? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconference). So, something with a much higher expectation of ACTIVITIES but one in which the said activities are actively discouraged from being organised in advance? That would certainly be interesting.
Richard Loxley - - Parent #
Yes, very similar to an Unconference.
I think Bungay, and to a lesser extent Bristol, are very close to what I'd imagined.
It's an interesting point about attendees organising things in advance. My thought was simply to unload work off the organisers, so this shouldn't necessarily be discouraged.
Of course with many conventions the boundaries are getting blurred, as people volunteer to make stuff happen. For instance at Bungay are the hot tub and wifi organised by the convention or by the attendees? At BJC are the extra shows provided by the convention? I think the fact that the line is blurred is showing that something is working, that the community is making the convention into what they want :-)
My musings were just that, wondering 'what if', and thinking about the convention that I'd like to organise, and that I'd like to attend. It probably works best with less than 200 people, but elements could be scaled up.
But ultimately it's all about the community, and as has been said 'by jugglers for jugglers'. I think there are many initiatives under way to keep that feeling. Long may it continue!
I've only really been going to conventions as a juggler for a year and a half now and the BTB format you describe makes me think of a how to run a club more than a convention (with the exception of Rest).
When I first started going I didn't know anyone, and I was more interested in the activities or workshops and the show when deciding on whether or not to go to a convention. Now I'm quite happy to turn up and juggle all day with people I don't often see.
It would be nice to organise a convention in this way, but it seems to me that conventions where booking/renting a space costs the bulk need to advertise things that are happening to entice people coming along and making sure that the convention doesn't make a loss. This is certainly the case in London and probably BJCs.
Subscribe to this forum via RSS
1 article per branch
1 article per post