Viewing all threads tagged #splits.
#splits -cocktail
Would you agree, that ..
- 5b splits,
- [54][22]2 with a higher 4 andor a lower 5,
- [32T] again with a higher thrown 2 andor a lower 3,
- ([44x],2)(2,[44x]) .. (or "[4x4]" same), where the height is equal,
are practically one and same. And ..
- 7b splits,
- [87][22]2 with a higher 7 andor a lower 8, where the balls land at distinct beats and the throw takes place after second ball landed in the other hand, but juggled fast and low will merge(?) with the other siteswaps,
- [43] with a higher 3 andor a lower 4 landing at theoretically (but practically not) the same beat and the throw also takes place after both balls landed in the other hand,
- ([66x],2)(2,[66x]) where the heights are equal, but the throws take place before the second ball landed in the other hand,
are also one and same practically?
Or would you as a jury member want to give a B-note or distinguish "nicer", "more accurate" splits (landing at same beat? or well spaced? fluent? at same height?) above catches done?
lukeburrage - - Parent #
If you need to say so much after each notation just to describe what you want unambiguously, you should probably try a new notation or stick to plain English. 5 ball horizontal split multiplex is good enough for 99.999% of situations this might come up.
Little Paul - - Parent #
Out of interest, how would beatmap deal with this?
lukeburrage - - Parent #
33x,1. 1, 11.*
No wait! .. :o] .. think, I read you wrong .. so regardless of [43] or [32T] or [44x], you'd call them all "horizontal splits", then?
Subscribe to this forum via RSS
1 article per branch
1 article per post